The biggest obstacle to Senate Republicans killing the disapproval of Trump’s emergency is Trump

US President Donald Trump speaks to the media before departing from the White House on March 8, 2019, in Washington, DC.

Once again, it’s unclear what exactly he’d agree to in a compromise.

President Trump wants to avoid a disastrous vote curbing his national emergency for the southern border wall, and one option on the table could be a deal with Senate Republicans. Lawmakers, however, aren’t sure if he’d hold up his end of the bargain, an outstanding question that’s threatening to mess with these negotiations.

In just one day, the Senate is expected to vote on blocking Trump’s national emergency. Already, four Republicans have said they are open to opposing the emergency — enough to ensure its passage — and Trump could be facing as many as 10 GOP defections. Trump has threatened to veto the legislation, but legal experts say congressional passage could still aid those challenging the president in court.

A group of Republican senators want to help Trump out and have proposed a trade. In exchange for voting against a resolution that would terminate the national emergency, they’re asking for the White House’s support on a measure that would significantly limit the ability of any president — including Trump — to use emergencies in the future, The Hill’s Alexander Bolton reports.

This measure, as introduced by Sen. Mike Lee on Tuesday, would amend the National Emergencies Act of 1976, and it would get a vote sometime later this spring if an agreement were made. Currently, a president’s declaration of national emergency expires one year after it is imposed unless the commander in chief decides to renew it. Lee’s measure would amend the original bill so that national emergencies expire just 30 days after they are declared unless Congress approves an extension, effectively curbing the power of the executive branch to use them.

Though some Senate Republicans have signaled an openness to considering this arrangement, they have very little guarantee the president would actually sign the measure to limit future emergencies. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has also said the House does not plan to take up the proposal.

As of Tuesday, Vice President Mike Pence did not offer a clear commitment to the plan, Bolton reports. A source close to the White House had also told Politico that Trump wasn’t necessarily guaranteed to back a bill that could limit his executive powers. Additionally, while Republicans senators were interested in putting a strict limit on the National Emergencies Act, the White House reportedly wanted to have a little more leeway.

It’s far from the first time that Trump’s unpredictability on a subject has gotten in the way of policy negotiations. Since lawmakers don’t know where he actually stands, let alone if he’s going to stick with a proposal, it’s making it tougher and tougher for Congress to actually reach a deal with him.

Trump’s unpredictability makes deal-making impossible

One reason Republicans might be wary of this deal: Trump’s fickleness has burned them before.

It was just last December when Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, seemingly with positive signals from the White House, triumphantly pushed through a short-term funding bill aimed at staving off a government shutdown — only to have Trump suddenly refuse to sign it. Shortly after, the government went into its longest-ever shutdown.

When McConnell announced that Trump was planning to sign a funding bill to reopen the government and declare a national emergency at the same time, he appeared so eager to make his statement he inadvertently cut off fellow Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley as he was making a speech. As observers commented at the time, there was a potential reason McConnell was in such a rush: He wanted to get the announcement out there before Trump changed his mind.

Democrats have also dealt with Trump’s unreliable promises. Last winter, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer worked on brokering an agreement with Trump that included the exchange of $25 billion for his border wall for a path to citizenship for DREAMERs, or undocumented immigrants who had come to the US as children. Democrats took heat for offering funds for the border wall at all, and Trump ultimately reneged on the proposal, leaving them to address the fallout.

“We’ve had limited success in dealing with this president,” Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) has previously told Politico. “His word isn’t good. Within 48 hours he reverses himself. It’s very difficult to enter into a long-term agreement.”

If the White House wants to win over Senate Republicans, it will have to prove that lawmakers can trust what Trump is offering. Otherwise, chances of a deal seem slim, and the numbers still look stacked against the president’s national emergency.

Author: Li Zhou

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *